Skip to content
PRS India

Vue 3 · Composition API · Nuxt · Pinia

Vue.js Development

Vue.js gives you React's component model with a calmer, more stable core and the cleanest way to handle changing data in frontend. We do Vue.js development in TypeScript on the Composition API — Nuxt where it must rank on Google, Pinia for state, and Inertia where Vue runs on a server-rendered backend.

Last updated

  • Vue 3 Composition API with <script setup>, typed throughout
  • Pinia for client state, a query layer for server state
  • Nuxt when it must render on the server and rank
  • Vue on Laravel via Inertia, with no separate API layer to maintain
Vue.js Development
Why Vue.js

React's component model, with a calmer core.

Vue.js is the framework teams pick when they want a component-based frontend without the constant change of rules that comes with React. Vue 3 is compact, very well documented and unusually stable. Its reactivity system is the easiest way to think about frontend. State feels like something you describe, not something you wire up. We do Vue.js development in TypeScript on the Composition API, and most of it is one of three kinds: a Vue SPA behind a login, a server-rendered Nuxt application that must rank, or Vue inside a server-rendered Laravel app through Inertia. Each is the right answer to a different problem. The first thing we do is match yours to the right one.

Talk to a Vue engineer
Vue 3
Composition API

Built with script setup and TypeScript, so reusing logic is easy with a composable and every component and store is typed.

Pinia
State kept honest

Client state in Pinia, server state in a query layer. One store holding both is a mess we refuse to ship.

Nuxt
When it must rank

Server rendering and static pages where SEO matters. A light Vite SPA where it does not.

AA
Accessible by build

Keyboard and screen-reader support built into the components, not added at the last minute before a check.

How we actually build it

Vue.js is the framework teams pick when they want React's component model without React's constant change of rules. Vue 3 with the Composition API and <script setup> is a compact, well-documented, very stable framework, and its reactivity system is the cleanest way to think in mainstream frontend. Most "Vue.js development" work falls into three kinds: a Vue SPA behind a login, a server-rendered Nuxt application that must rank, and Vue components embedded into an existing server-rendered app, often a Laravel one via Inertia.

Vue 3, the Composition API and why we do not miss Options

We build in the Composition API with <script setup>, because it makes logic reuse a matter of pulling out a composable rather than tangling mixins, and it types cleanly. The reactivity system — ref, reactive, computed and watch — is really easy to follow once the ref-versus-reactive line is clear, and it is the part of Vue that makes state feel like something you describe rather than something you wire. We write Vue in TypeScript throughout, because a typed component and a typed store catch the errors that otherwise reach a user as a broken screen.

Pinia for state, without the Vuex ceremony

Pinia is the state library Vue really wants: typed, modular, easy with devtools, and free of the extra code that made large Vuex stores a chore. As with any framework, what matters is keeping server state — data fetched from an API — separate from genuine client state. We pair Pinia for client state with a query layer such as TanStack Query for Vue, or Nuxt's own data fetching, for server state, so caching and refreshing are handled once and not rebuilt in every component. A single Pinia store holding both fetched data and UI state is the mess we most often untangle.

Nuxt when it must render on the server

A client-rendered Vue SPA has the same limitation as any SPA: a blank page until the bundle loads, and nothing for a search crawler to read. When the application is public and needs SEO, we build it in Nuxt, which gives server rendering, file-based routing, a data-fetching layer and static pages without putting them together by hand. For a logged-in dashboard where ranking is irrelevant, a plain Vue SPA on Vite is lighter and fully fine. Choosing Nuxt for an internal tool, or a bare SPA for a public site, are the two mistakes we sort out in the first week.

Vue inside a server-rendered app

A great deal of practical Vue never becomes a SPA at all. It lives as small interactive parts inside a server-rendered application. With Laravel and Inertia, Vue renders the pages while the server owns routing, login and data. So you get a modern reactive frontend without building and versioning a separate API layer. It is a good, often overlooked design for a team that wants Vue\'s ergonomics on the frontend and a conventional backend behind it, and we build it often.

The honest part

When Vue.js is the right call — and when it is not.

  Choose Vue.js Choose something else
Team values stability and readable code Yes. Vue's core changes slowly and the code stays easy to read. This is a real advantage for a product that will live a long time. If the team already knows React well and works fast, there is no reason to switch.
You run Laravel and want a reactive frontend Vue via Inertia. A modern frontend with no separate API layer to build and secure. Livewire if you would rather stay almost fully on the server side. Both work very well in Laravel.
Public app that must rank Yes, as Nuxt with server rendering, not a client-rendered SPA. For plain content, a CMS or static-page tool may be simpler than any framework.
React web + React Native mobile roadmap Think about it carefully. You will not share code between Vue web and React Native mobile. React for both web and mobile if sharing code with React Native is important.
Very large hiring pool is critical Vue developers are good and growing in number, but there are more React developers. React if you need to hire many people quickly in a tough market.
Mostly static marketing content A client SPA is too much. Use Nuxt static pages or a lighter tool. Astro or a static-page tool sends almost no JavaScript and shows the page faster.
What we build

Vue.js work we take on.

Vue SPAs & dashboards

Screens full of data behind a login, such as filters, tables, charts and live updates. Built in the Composition API and TypeScript, and kept fast and clear as they grow.

Nuxt applications

Public, server-rendered Vue that ranks well and shows up fast: file-based routing, a data layer, static pages and real HTML for crawlers.

Vue on Laravel via Inertia

A modern reactive frontend, with the server still owning routing, login and data. No separate API layer to build, version and secure.

Component libraries

A typed, documented, easy-to-use Vue component library in Histoire. Your product and marketing pages share it, so the brand stays the same everywhere.

Vue 2 to Vue 3 migration

Moving off Vue 2, which is no longer supported, to Vue 3 and the Composition API step by step. The store moves from Vuex to Pinia while the app keeps shipping.

Performance & accessibility

A speed check against real-user data, the re-render and bundle problems fixed, WCAG gaps closed, and limits checked in CI so it stays fixed.

Characteristics

What Vue gives you, with the caveats.

  • A calm, stable core

    Vue changes slowly and with care, so you do not need to learn your code again every year. For a product that lives a long time, this stability is worth more than something new.

  • The cleanest reactivity model

    Refs, computed values and watchers make state easy to follow. Once the ref-versus-reactive line is clear, describing state stops feeling like wiring.

  • Types across components and stores

    The Composition API and Pinia type cleanly, catching the errors that otherwise reach a user as a broken screen. We build all Vue in TypeScript.

  • Server state handled once

    A query layer does caching and refreshing, so it is not rebuilt in every component. Pinia holds only real client state.

  • Real HTML through Nuxt

    Where ranking matters, Nuxt renders on the server. Crawlers and users get real HTML and a fast first view, not a blank page waiting on a bundle.

  • A smaller but strong hiring pool

    Vue developers in India are skilled and growing in number, though fewer than React developers. Worth thinking about if you plan to hire many people quickly.

How we build

From the rendering decision to a Vue app that ages well.

The decisions that shape a Vue project are settled first. Then we build it in small, complete slices.

  1. 01

    Settle the architecture

    Week 1

    SPA, Nuxt or Inertia. Where server rendering is needed. How Pinia and the query layer share the state. We write down the choice and the pros and cons before building, because these are costly to change later.

  2. 02

    Composables and component library

    Weeks 1–3

    Shared logic pulled into typed composables, and an easy-to-use component library with design tokens and every empty, loading and error state, documented in Histoire.

  3. 03

    Build in vertical slices

    Weeks 3–12

    Each sprint ships a working path from screen to data, typed from start to finish. You get a demo and a list of changes every two weeks, and tests on the flows that carry risk.

  4. 04

    Profile and budget

    Ongoing

    Reactivity and re-render problems are found and fixed, the bundle is kept under its size limit in CI, and Core Web Vitals are checked against real-user data.

  5. 05

    Hand over

    Final week

    The component library, a design note and a getting-started session so your team owns it. Or we move to a monthly plan and keep shipping.

The stack

What ships with a Vue.js build from us.

Tools we pick when the choice is ours. We swap them for what your team already runs.

Vue 3
TypeScript
Nuxt 3
Vite

Bring us the Vue app to build, migrate off Vue 2, or make fast.

Tell us what it does and where it hurts. A senior engineer reads every enquiry and replies within one business day with scope, risk and a price, not a brochure.

FAQ

The questions you were going to ask on the call.

By the team and the tools you already use, more than by any technical gap. Both are excellent. Vue is often the calmer choice. It has a more stable core with fewer rule changes, a very clean reactivity model and an easy learning curve. This suits teams that value stability and readable code. React has more tools and more developers to hire, and shares more with React Native if mobile is in your plan. If your team already writes Vue, or you run Laravel and want Vue via Inertia, Vue is the natural fit. We would not move a healthy React app to Vue, or the other way, without a clear reason.

Nuxt when the application is public and needs SEO and a fast first paint: it gives server rendering, file-based routing, a data-fetching layer and static pages without you putting them together by hand. A plain Vue SPA on Vite when it is a dashboard behind a login where ranking does not matter. It is lighter and has fewer parts. The two mistakes we sort out in week one are picking Nuxt for a purely internal tool, which adds server-rendering work you do not need, and shipping a bare SPA for a public site that then cannot be found.

For anything beyond a small app, yes. The Composition API with script setup makes reusing logic a matter of pulling out a composable rather than tangling mixins. It types far more cleanly, and it keeps related logic together instead of scattered across lifecycle options. The Options API is not deprecated and existing code is fine, so this is not an urgent move. But we build new Vue in the Composition API and TypeScript, because that is where the tools and type safety are strongest.

With Pinia for client state — it is typed, modular and easy to use with devtools, without the extra code that made large Vuex stores a chore. Most important, server state is kept separate. Data fetched from an API belongs in a query layer such as TanStack Query for Vue, or Nuxt's own data fetching, which handle caching and refreshing once, so they are not rebuilt in every component. The mess we most often untangle is a single Pinia store holding both fetched data and UI state. Keeping the two apart is what keeps a Vue app easy to maintain as it grows.

Yes, and it is a good design that people often overlook. With Inertia, Vue renders your pages while Laravel keeps owning routing, authentication and data — so you get a modern reactive Vue frontend without building, versioning and securing a separate API layer just to feed it. It suits a team that wants Vue's ergonomics on the frontend and a normal, well-known backend behind it. If you later need a public API for a mobile app or partners, you add it on purpose. You do not have to build it first.

A focused Vue front end over an existing API usually takes 8 to 14 weeks and starts from around ₹8,00,000. A Nuxt application that must render on the server and rank, or a larger product with complex state, takes 16 to 24 weeks and costs more. Vue on Laravel via Inertia is often the fastest way to a full product, because there is no separate API layer to build. As with any frontend, what changes the price is the number of outside systems and how they behave. A paid discovery exists to find this out before we quote.

Let's talk vue.js development

Bring us the hard version of the problem.

A senior engineer reads every enquiry. You'll get a real answer — scope, risk and a number — within one business day.