Skip to content
PRSINDIA

Vue 3 · Composition API · Nuxt · Pinia

Vue.js Development

Vue.js gives you React's component model with a calmer, more stable core and the cleanest reactivity in frontend. We do Vue.js development in TypeScript on the Composition API — Nuxt where it must rank, Pinia for state, and Inertia where Vue rides on a server-rendered backend.

  • Vue 3 Composition API with <script setup>, typed throughout
  • Pinia for client state, a query layer for server state
  • Nuxt when it must render on the server and rank
  • Vue on Laravel via Inertia — no separate API tier to maintain
Why Vue.js

React's component model, with a calmer core.

Vue.js is the framework teams reach for when they want a component-driven frontend without the constant churn of conventions that surrounds React. Vue 3 is compact, exceptionally well documented, and unusually stable, and its reactivity system is the cleanest mental model in mainstream frontend — state feels like something you describe rather than something you wire. We do Vue.js development in TypeScript on the Composition API, and most of it takes one of three shapes: a Vue SPA behind a login, a server-rendered Nuxt application that must rank, or Vue riding inside a server-rendered Laravel app through Inertia. Each is the right answer to a different problem, and the first thing we do is make sure yours is matched to the right one.

Talk to a Vue engineer
Vue 3
Composition API

Built with script setup and TypeScript, so logic reuse is a composable and every component and store is typed.

Pinia
State kept honest

Client state in Pinia, server state in a query layer. One store holding both is the tangle we refuse to ship.

Nuxt
When it must rank

Server rendering and static generation where SEO matters; a lean Vite SPA where it does not.

AA
Accessible by build

Keyboard and screen-reader support built into the components, not retrofitted before an audit.

How we actually build it

Vue.js is the framework teams pick when they want React's component model without React's constant churn of conventions. Vue 3 with the Composition API and <script setup> is a compact, well-documented, remarkably stable framework, and its reactivity system is the cleanest mental model in mainstream frontend. Most "Vue.js development" work divides into three: a Vue SPA behind a login, a server-rendered Nuxt application that must rank, and Vue components embedded into an existing server-rendered app — often a Laravel one via Inertia.

Vue 3, the Composition API and why we do not miss Options

We build in the Composition API with <script setup>, because it makes logic reuse a matter of extracting a composable rather than tangling mixins, and it types cleanly. The reactivity system — ref, reactive, computed and watch — is genuinely intuitive once the ref-versus-reactive boundary is clear, and it is the part of Vue that makes state feel like something you describe rather than something you wire. We write Vue in TypeScript throughout, because a typed component and a typed store catch the errors that otherwise reach a user as a broken screen.

Pinia for state, without the Vuex ceremony

Pinia is the state library Vue actually wants: typed, modular, devtools-friendly, and free of the boilerplate that made large Vuex stores a chore. As with any framework, the discipline that matters is keeping server state — data fetched from an API — separate from genuine client state. We pair Pinia for client state with a query layer such as TanStack Query for Vue, or Nuxt's own data fetching, for server state, so caching and invalidation are handled once rather than reinvented in every component. A single Pinia store holding both fetched data and UI state is the tangle we most often unpick.

Nuxt when it must render on the server

A client-rendered Vue SPA has the same limitation as any SPA: a blank page until the bundle loads, and nothing for a crawler to read. When the application is public and needs SEO, we build it in Nuxt, which gives server rendering, file-based routing, a data-fetching layer and static generation without assembling them by hand. For a logged-in dashboard where ranking is irrelevant, a plain Vue SPA on Vite is lighter and entirely appropriate. Choosing Nuxt for an internal tool, or a bare SPA for a public site, are the two mistakes we settle in the first week.

Vue inside a server-rendered app

A great deal of practical Vue never becomes a SPA at all: it lives as islands of interactivity inside a server-rendered application. With Laravel and Inertia, Vue renders the pages while the server owns routing, auth and data, so you get a modern reactive frontend without building and versioning a separate API tier. It is an underrated architecture for a team that wants Vue\'s ergonomics on the frontend and a conventional backend behind it, and we build it often.

The honest part

When Vue.js is the right call — and when it is not.

  Choose Vue.js Choose something else
Team values stability and readable code Yes. Vue's core changes slowly and the code stays approachable — a real advantage for a long-lived product. If the team is already deep in React and productive, there is no reason to switch.
You run Laravel and want a reactive frontend Vue via Inertia — a modern frontend with no separate API tier to build and secure. Livewire if you would rather stay almost entirely server-side; both are first-class in Laravel.
Public app that must rank Yes, as Nuxt with server rendering — not a client-rendered SPA. For pure content, a CMS or static generator may be simpler than any framework.
React web + React Native mobile roadmap Weigh it carefully — you will not share code between Vue web and React Native mobile. React across web and mobile if code sharing with React Native is a priority.
Very large hiring pool is critical Vue talent is strong and growing, but React's pool is larger. React if you need to hire at scale quickly in a competitive market.
Mostly static marketing content A client SPA is overkill; use Nuxt static generation or a lighter tool. Astro or a static generator ships near-zero JavaScript and paints faster.
What we build

Vue.js work we take on.

Vue SPAs & dashboards

Data-dense interfaces behind a login — filters, tables, charts, live updates — in the Composition API and TypeScript, kept fast and legible as they grow.

Nuxt applications

Public, server-rendered Vue that ranks and paints fast: file-based routing, a data layer, static generation and real HTML for crawlers.

Vue on Laravel via Inertia

A modern reactive frontend with the server still owning routing, auth and data — no separate API tier to build, version and secure.

Component libraries

A typed, documented, accessible Vue component library in Histoire that your product and marketing surfaces share, so the brand stays consistent.

Vue 2 to Vue 3 migration

Off end-of-life Vue 2 and onto Vue 3 and the Composition API incrementally, with the store moved from Vuex to Pinia, while the app keeps shipping.

Performance & accessibility

A profile against field data, the re-render and bundle problems fixed, WCAG gaps closed, and budgets enforced in CI so it stays fixed.

Characteristics

What Vue gives you, with the caveats.

  • A calm, stable core

    Vue changes slowly and deliberately, so a codebase does not need re-learning every year. For a long-lived product this stability is worth more than novelty.

  • The cleanest reactivity model

    Refs, computed values and watchers make state intuitive. Once the ref-versus-reactive boundary is clear, describing state stops feeling like wiring.

  • Types across components and stores

    The Composition API and Pinia type cleanly, catching the errors that otherwise reach a user as a broken screen. We build Vue in TypeScript throughout.

  • Server state handled once

    A query layer does caching and invalidation, so it is not reinvented per component. Pinia holds only genuine client state.

  • Real HTML through Nuxt

    Where ranking matters, Nuxt renders on the server so crawlers and users get real HTML and a fast paint — not a blank page waiting on a bundle.

  • A smaller but strong hiring pool

    Vue talent in India is capable and growing, though smaller than React's. Worth weighing if you plan to hire at scale quickly.

How we build

From the rendering decision to a Vue app that ages well.

The decisions that shape a Vue project, settled first, then built in vertical slices.

  1. 01

    Settle the architecture

    Week 1

    SPA, Nuxt or Inertia; where server rendering is needed; how Pinia and the query layer divide state. We write the choice and the trade-off down before building, because these are expensive to reverse.

  2. 02

    Composables and component library

    Weeks 1–3

    Shared logic extracted into typed composables, an accessible component library with tokens and every empty, loading and error state, documented in Histoire.

  3. 03

    Build in vertical slices

    Weeks 3–12

    Each sprint ships a working path from interface to data, typed end to end, with a demo and changelog every fortnight and tests on the flows that carry risk.

  4. 04

    Profile and budget

    Ongoing

    Reactivity and re-render problems profiled and fixed, the bundle held under budget in CI, and Core Web Vitals checked against real field data.

  5. 05

    Hand over

    Final week

    The component library, an architecture note and an onboarding session so your team owns it — or we roll into a retainer and keep shipping.

The stack

What ships with a Vue.js build from us.

Defaults we reach for when the choice is ours, swapped freely for what your team already runs.

Vue 3
TypeScript
Nuxt 3
Vite

Bring us the Vue app to build, migrate off Vue 2, or make fast.

Tell us what it does and where it hurts. A senior engineer reads every enquiry and replies within one business day with scope, risk and a number — not a brochure.

FAQ

The questions you were going to ask on the call.

By the team and the ecosystem you are already in, more than by any technical gap — both are excellent. Vue is often the calmer choice: a more stable core with fewer convention changes, an exceptionally clean reactivity model, and a gentle learning curve, which suits teams that value stability and readable code. React has the larger ecosystem and hiring pool and shares more with React Native if mobile is on the roadmap. If your team already writes Vue, or you run Laravel and want Vue via Inertia, Vue is the natural fit. We would not migrate a healthy React app to Vue, or the reverse, without a concrete reason.

Nuxt when the application is public and needs SEO and a fast first paint: it gives server rendering, file-based routing, a data-fetching layer and static generation without you assembling them by hand. A plain Vue SPA on Vite when it is a logged-in dashboard behind authentication where ranking is irrelevant — it is lighter and has fewer moving parts. The two mistakes we settle in week one are picking Nuxt for a purely internal tool, which adds server-rendering complexity you do not need, and shipping a bare SPA for a public site that then cannot be found.

For anything beyond a small app, yes. The Composition API with script setup makes logic reuse a matter of extracting a composable rather than tangling mixins, it types far more cleanly, and it keeps related logic together instead of scattered across lifecycle options. The Options API is not deprecated and existing code is fine, so this is not an emergency migration. But we build new Vue in the Composition API and TypeScript, because that is where the ecosystem, the tooling and the type safety are strongest.

With Pinia for client state — it is typed, modular and devtools-friendly, without the boilerplate that made large Vuex stores a chore — and, crucially, with server state kept separate. Data fetched from an API belongs in a query layer such as TanStack Query for Vue, or Nuxt's own data fetching, which handle caching and invalidation once rather than having them reinvented per component. The tangle we most often unpick is a single Pinia store holding both fetched data and UI state; separating the two is what keeps a Vue app maintainable as it grows.

Yes, and it is an underrated architecture. With Inertia, Vue renders your pages while Laravel keeps owning routing, authentication and data — so you get a modern reactive Vue frontend without building, versioning and securing a separate API tier just to feed it. It suits a team that wants Vue's ergonomics on the frontend and a conventional, well-understood backend behind it. If you later need a public API for a mobile app or partners, that becomes a deliberate addition rather than a foundation you were forced to build up front.

A focused Vue front end over an existing API is typically 8 to 14 weeks from around ₹8,00,000. A Nuxt application that must render on the server and rank, or a larger product with complex state, runs 16 to 24 weeks and prices up from there. Vue on Laravel via Inertia is often the fastest route to a full product, because there is no separate API tier to build. As with any frontend, the real variable is the number and behaviour of the upstream systems, which is what a paid discovery exists to price before we quote.

Proof

Shipped, measured, still running.

All case studies

Swasthya Sarathi

A healthcare-companion platform for Swasthya Sarathi

A website and mobile app development project for a multi-service healthcare companion — helping peop...

Read it

MV Tech Education

A course and admissions platform for MV Tech Education

A website development project for a Bihar vocational institute — a course-catalogue and admissions s...

Read it

Patna Taxi

A booking-focused taxi website for Patna Taxi across Bihar

A website development project for a Patna and Muzaffarpur cab operator — a fast, mobile-first taxi-b...

Read it

Let's talk vue.js development

Bring us the hard version of the problem.

A senior engineer reads every enquiry. You'll get a real answer — scope, risk and a number — within one business day.