Skip to content
PRSINDIA

React 19 · TypeScript · Vite · TanStack Query

React Development

React is the easy part; the decisions around it are where apps succeed or rot. We do React development in TypeScript with the right rendering model, server state handled by TanStack Query, and re-renders profiled rather than guessed at.

  • The right rendering model — SPA or server-rendered, decided first
  • Server state on TanStack Query, client state kept small
  • TypeScript throughout; re-renders profiled, not guessed
  • Bundle budget enforced in CI, accessibility built in
Why React

The library is easy. The decisions around it are the job.

React won the frontend because it made building complex interfaces tractable, and almost the entire ecosystem now assumes it. But the library is the easy part. The reason a React project succeeds or rots is a set of decisions around it: which framework wraps it, whether it renders on the server, how server state and client state are kept apart, and whether anyone is watching the bundle. We do React development that gets those decisions right first, in TypeScript, with server state on a proper data layer and client state kept small and deliberate. The result is the React people forget to complain about — fast on a mid-range phone, legible to the next engineer, and still pleasant to work in three years later.

Talk to a React engineer
TS
Typed throughout

Every component contract typed, so prop and shape errors fail in the editor rather than as a white screen in production.

<200
Bundle budget

A first-load budget on the critical route, enforced in CI. A regression fails the build, not the quarter.

INP
Profiled, not guessed

Interaction latency measured with the React profiler; needless re-renders found and fixed at the cause.

AA
Accessibility built in

Components on accessible primitives so keyboard and screen-reader support is structural, not retrofitted before an audit.

How we actually build it

React is the library the rest of the frontend world orbits, and most of what people call "React development" is really a set of decisions around React: which framework wraps it, how state is managed, how data is fetched, and whether the app should render on the server at all. Get those four right and React is a joy to maintain for years. Get them wrong and you have the sprawling, re-rendering, prop-drilled application that gives React its bad reputation.

Not every React app should be a single-page app

The reflex to reach for a client-rendered SPA is the source of most of the React pain we are asked to fix: a blank page until a large bundle downloads and executes, no SEO without heroics, and a slow first paint on the mid-range Android your users actually hold. If the app is public and needs to rank, we build it in Next.js with server rendering so crawlers and users get real HTML. If it is a logged-in dashboard behind auth where SEO is irrelevant, a lean Vite SPA is the right and simpler choice. The mistake is applying one answer to both, and it is the first thing we settle.

Data fetching is a solved problem — stop solving it again

An enormous amount of buggy React is hand-rolled data fetching: useEffect chains, loading flags, race conditions and stale caches reinvented in every component. We standardise on TanStack Query (or the framework's own data layer) for server state — caching, deduplication, background refetching and invalidation handled once, correctly. That leaves genuine client state — the cart drawer, the wizard step, the theme — for a small, deliberate store like Zustand, or Redux Toolkit when the app is large and the team wants strict conventions. Conflating server state and client state into one global blob is the single most common architectural error we untangle.

TypeScript, and re-renders you can actually see

We write React in TypeScript, always, because a typed component contract catches the prop and shape errors that otherwise surface as a white screen in production. On performance, we do not guess: we profile with the React DevTools profiler, find the components re-rendering for no reason, and fix the actual cause — an unstable callback, a context that is too broad, a list without stable keys — rather than sprinkling memo everywhere and hoping. Most "React is slow" complaints are a handful of fixable re-render problems, not the framework.

The tooling that keeps it maintainable

Vite for the dev server and build, because fast feedback is not a luxury. A component library built on accessible primitives — Radix or React Aria — so keyboard and screen-reader support is structural rather than retrofitted. Testing with React Testing Library at the component level and Playwright for the flows that carry money. And a bundle budget enforced in CI, because a React app's size only ever grows unless someone is watching it, and the person watching should be the build, not a customer on a slow connection.

The honest part

When React is the right call — and when it is not.

  Choose React Choose something else
Complex, interactive product UI Yes. This is what React is for — rich state, many components, a design system shared across surfaces. For a largely static content site, a lighter tool renders faster with far less JavaScript.
Public page that must rank Yes, but as Next.js with server rendering — not a client-rendered SPA. For pure content with a team that lives in it, a CMS or a static site generator can be simpler.
Mostly static marketing content Overkill as a client SPA; you ship a lot of JavaScript to render text. Astro or a static generator: near-zero JavaScript, faster paint, cheaper to run.
You have a React web + mobile roadmap Strong. Types, validation schemas and logic share with a React Native client with little duplication. If mobile is Flutter, that sharing evaporates — weigh it before committing.
Simple server-rendered site, small team Consider whether you need a SPA at all before taking on its build and caching complexity. Laravel Blade or a server-rendered stack ships faster for a team that already runs it.
Team is Vue- or Angular-first No reason to force React if the team is productive and invested elsewhere. Stay in Vue or Angular; the ecosystem advantage is real only if your team lives in it.
What we build

React work we take on.

Product dashboards & portals

Data-dense interfaces with real state — filters, tables, charts, live updates — built to stay fast and legible as they grow, in TypeScript throughout.

Server-rendered React (Next.js)

Public surfaces that must rank and load fast: server rendering, real HTML for crawlers, and a bundle that stays within budget on a mid-range phone.

Design systems & component libraries

A typed, documented, accessible component library in Storybook that your marketing site and product both consume, so the brand stops drifting between them.

Real-time interfaces

Live dashboards, collaborative editing and presence over WebSockets, with the server-state and reconnection edge cases handled rather than hoped away.

React rescue & refactor

Hand-rolled fetching, a global store holding everything, no types and no tests — fixed incrementally while the app keeps shipping.

Performance & Core Web Vitals

A profile against real field data, the re-render and bundle problems fixed at the cause, and budgets enforced in CI so it does not silently regress.

Characteristics

What good React gives you, with the caveats.

  • The largest ecosystem in frontend

    A library, a component and a hiring pool for almost anything. This breadth is React's decisive advantage — and, unmanaged, the source of its bloat.

  • Typed component contracts

    TypeScript catches the prop and shape errors that otherwise surface as a white screen. We treat an untyped public component as a defect.

  • Server state handled once

    TanStack Query does caching, deduplication and invalidation correctly, so it is not reinvented — buggily — in every component.

  • Real HTML when it matters

    Server-rendered React gives crawlers and users real HTML with a fast first paint. A client SPA gives them a blank page and a bundle to wait for.

  • Accessibility by construction

    Built on accessible primitives, keyboard and screen-reader support is structural. Retrofitting it after an audit costs far more.

  • A bundle someone is watching

    A React bundle only grows unless the build enforces a budget. We make the build the watcher, not a customer on a slow connection.

How we build

From decisions to a React app that ages well.

The four decisions that decide a React project, settled up front, then built in vertical slices.

  1. 01

    Settle the four decisions

    Week 1

    Rendering model (SPA or server-rendered), framework, state architecture and data layer. We write down the choice and the trade-off before a component is built, because these are expensive to change later.

  2. 02

    Component library and tokens

    Weeks 1–3

    Accessible primitives, design tokens, and the empty, loading and error states nobody remembers to draw. Documented in Storybook so the team builds from one source, not screenshots.

  3. 03

    Build in vertical slices

    Weeks 3–12

    Each sprint delivers a working path from interface to API, typed end to end, with server state on the data layer and tests on the flows that carry risk. A demo and changelog every fortnight.

  4. 04

    Profile and budget

    Ongoing

    Re-renders profiled and fixed at the cause, the bundle held under budget in CI, and Core Web Vitals checked against field data rather than a lab run on office wifi.

  5. 05

    Hand over

    Final week

    The component library, the architecture note and an onboarding session so your team owns it — or we roll into a retainer and keep shipping the roadmap.

The stack

What ships with a React build from us.

Defaults we reach for when the choice is ours, swapped freely for what your team already runs.

React 19
TypeScript
Vite
Next.js

Bring us the React app that is slow, sprawling, or not ranking.

Tell us what it does and where it hurts. A senior engineer reads every enquiry and replies within one business day with scope, risk and a number — not a brochure.

FAQ

The questions you were going to ask on the call.

It depends on one thing: does it need to be found by Google. If the app is public and ranking matters — marketing, content, a storefront — we build it server-rendered in Next.js so crawlers and users receive real HTML and the first paint is fast on a mid-range phone. If it is a logged-in dashboard behind authentication where SEO is irrelevant, a lean Vite SPA is simpler and entirely appropriate. Most of the React pain we are hired to fix comes from building a client-rendered SPA for a page that needed server rendering, so we settle this before anything else.

By first separating server state from client state, because conflating them is the most common architectural mistake we untangle. Server state — anything fetched from an API — belongs in TanStack Query or the framework's data layer, which handle caching, deduplication, background refetching and invalidation correctly so you are not reinventing them in every component. Genuine client state — a cart drawer, a wizard step, a theme — goes in a small deliberate store like Zustand, or Redux Toolkit when the app is large and the team wants strict conventions. A single global blob holding both is how React apps become unmaintainable.

Almost never the framework itself. In practice "React is slow" is a handful of fixable problems: components re-rendering because of an unstable callback or an over-broad context, a list without stable keys, a bundle that has quietly grown to several megabytes, or data fetched on the client that should have been rendered on the server. We profile with the React DevTools profiler to find the real cause rather than sprinkling memo everywhere and hoping, enforce a bundle budget in CI, and move work to the server where it belongs. The fix is usually targeted and quick.

Not really — Next.js is a framework built on React, so the question is whether you want a framework wrapping React or React on its own with a build tool like Vite. For anything public that needs server rendering, routing and SEO handled for you, Next.js is the sensible default. For a self-contained SPA behind a login, plain React on Vite is lighter and gives you fewer moving parts. We build both, often in the same organisation — a Next.js public surface and a Vite internal tool sharing one component library — and choose per application rather than by fashion.

Regularly. We start with a short audit: we read the code, profile it, and map the state management and data-fetching patterns. The common findings are hand-rolled data fetching full of race conditions, a global store holding everything, missing TypeScript, no tests around the critical flows, and a bundle nobody has been watching. We hand you a written report with a prioritised plan, then fix it incrementally while the app keeps shipping — introducing types, a proper data layer and a bundle budget without a disruptive rewrite.

A focused React front end over an existing API — a dashboard or a portal — is typically 8 to 14 weeks from around ₹8,00,000. A larger product with complex state, real-time features and a shared component library runs 16 to 24 weeks and prices accordingly. If the app must rank and needs server rendering, we build it in Next.js and scope that separately. The honest variable is rarely the React itself; it is how many upstream systems the front end integrates and how well they behave, which discovery exists to pin down.

Proof

Shipped, measured, still running.

All case studies

Swasthya Sarathi

A healthcare-companion platform for Swasthya Sarathi

A website and mobile app development project for a multi-service healthcare companion — helping peop...

Read it

MV Tech Education

A course and admissions platform for MV Tech Education

A website development project for a Bihar vocational institute — a course-catalogue and admissions s...

Read it

Patna Taxi

A booking-focused taxi website for Patna Taxi across Bihar

A website development project for a Patna and Muzaffarpur cab operator — a fast, mobile-first taxi-b...

Read it

Let's talk react development

Bring us the hard version of the problem.

A senior engineer reads every enquiry. You'll get a real answer — scope, risk and a number — within one business day.