Swasthya Sarathi
A healthcare-companion platform for Swasthya Sarathi
A website and mobile app development project for a multi-service healthcare companion — helping peop...
Read itReact 19 · TypeScript · Vite · TanStack Query
React is the easy part; the decisions around it are where apps succeed or rot. We do React development in TypeScript with the right rendering model, server state handled by TanStack Query, and re-renders profiled rather than guessed at.
React won the frontend because it made building complex interfaces tractable, and almost the entire ecosystem now assumes it. But the library is the easy part. The reason a React project succeeds or rots is a set of decisions around it: which framework wraps it, whether it renders on the server, how server state and client state are kept apart, and whether anyone is watching the bundle. We do React development that gets those decisions right first, in TypeScript, with server state on a proper data layer and client state kept small and deliberate. The result is the React people forget to complain about — fast on a mid-range phone, legible to the next engineer, and still pleasant to work in three years later.
Talk to a React engineerEvery component contract typed, so prop and shape errors fail in the editor rather than as a white screen in production.
A first-load budget on the critical route, enforced in CI. A regression fails the build, not the quarter.
Interaction latency measured with the React profiler; needless re-renders found and fixed at the cause.
Components on accessible primitives so keyboard and screen-reader support is structural, not retrofitted before an audit.
React is the library the rest of the frontend world orbits, and most of what people call "React development" is really a set of decisions around React: which framework wraps it, how state is managed, how data is fetched, and whether the app should render on the server at all. Get those four right and React is a joy to maintain for years. Get them wrong and you have the sprawling, re-rendering, prop-drilled application that gives React its bad reputation.
The reflex to reach for a client-rendered SPA is the source of most of the React pain we are asked to fix: a blank page until a large bundle downloads and executes, no SEO without heroics, and a slow first paint on the mid-range Android your users actually hold. If the app is public and needs to rank, we build it in Next.js with server rendering so crawlers and users get real HTML. If it is a logged-in dashboard behind auth where SEO is irrelevant, a lean Vite SPA is the right and simpler choice. The mistake is applying one answer to both, and it is the first thing we settle.
An enormous amount of buggy React is hand-rolled data fetching: useEffect chains, loading flags, race conditions and stale caches reinvented in every component. We standardise on TanStack Query (or the framework's own data layer) for server state — caching, deduplication, background refetching and invalidation handled once, correctly. That leaves genuine client state — the cart drawer, the wizard step, the theme — for a small, deliberate store like Zustand, or Redux Toolkit when the app is large and the team wants strict conventions. Conflating server state and client state into one global blob is the single most common architectural error we untangle.
We write React in TypeScript, always, because a typed component contract catches the prop and shape errors that otherwise surface as a white screen in production. On performance, we do not guess: we profile with the React DevTools profiler, find the components re-rendering for no reason, and fix the actual cause — an unstable callback, a context that is too broad, a list without stable keys — rather than sprinkling memo everywhere and hoping. Most "React is slow" complaints are a handful of fixable re-render problems, not the framework.
Vite for the dev server and build, because fast feedback is not a luxury. A component library built on accessible primitives — Radix or React Aria — so keyboard and screen-reader support is structural rather than retrofitted. Testing with React Testing Library at the component level and Playwright for the flows that carry money. And a bundle budget enforced in CI, because a React app's size only ever grows unless someone is watching it, and the person watching should be the build, not a customer on a slow connection.
| Choose React | Choose something else | |
|---|---|---|
| Complex, interactive product UI | Yes. This is what React is for — rich state, many components, a design system shared across surfaces. | For a largely static content site, a lighter tool renders faster with far less JavaScript. |
| Public page that must rank | Yes, but as Next.js with server rendering — not a client-rendered SPA. | For pure content with a team that lives in it, a CMS or a static site generator can be simpler. |
| Mostly static marketing content | Overkill as a client SPA; you ship a lot of JavaScript to render text. | Astro or a static generator: near-zero JavaScript, faster paint, cheaper to run. |
| You have a React web + mobile roadmap | Strong. Types, validation schemas and logic share with a React Native client with little duplication. | If mobile is Flutter, that sharing evaporates — weigh it before committing. |
| Simple server-rendered site, small team | Consider whether you need a SPA at all before taking on its build and caching complexity. | Laravel Blade or a server-rendered stack ships faster for a team that already runs it. |
| Team is Vue- or Angular-first | No reason to force React if the team is productive and invested elsewhere. | Stay in Vue or Angular; the ecosystem advantage is real only if your team lives in it. |
Data-dense interfaces with real state — filters, tables, charts, live updates — built to stay fast and legible as they grow, in TypeScript throughout.
Public surfaces that must rank and load fast: server rendering, real HTML for crawlers, and a bundle that stays within budget on a mid-range phone.
A typed, documented, accessible component library in Storybook that your marketing site and product both consume, so the brand stops drifting between them.
Live dashboards, collaborative editing and presence over WebSockets, with the server-state and reconnection edge cases handled rather than hoped away.
Hand-rolled fetching, a global store holding everything, no types and no tests — fixed incrementally while the app keeps shipping.
A profile against real field data, the re-render and bundle problems fixed at the cause, and budgets enforced in CI so it does not silently regress.
A library, a component and a hiring pool for almost anything. This breadth is React's decisive advantage — and, unmanaged, the source of its bloat.
TypeScript catches the prop and shape errors that otherwise surface as a white screen. We treat an untyped public component as a defect.
TanStack Query does caching, deduplication and invalidation correctly, so it is not reinvented — buggily — in every component.
Server-rendered React gives crawlers and users real HTML with a fast first paint. A client SPA gives them a blank page and a bundle to wait for.
Built on accessible primitives, keyboard and screen-reader support is structural. Retrofitting it after an audit costs far more.
A React bundle only grows unless the build enforces a budget. We make the build the watcher, not a customer on a slow connection.
The four decisions that decide a React project, settled up front, then built in vertical slices.
Rendering model (SPA or server-rendered), framework, state architecture and data layer. We write down the choice and the trade-off before a component is built, because these are expensive to change later.
Accessible primitives, design tokens, and the empty, loading and error states nobody remembers to draw. Documented in Storybook so the team builds from one source, not screenshots.
Each sprint delivers a working path from interface to API, typed end to end, with server state on the data layer and tests on the flows that carry risk. A demo and changelog every fortnight.
Re-renders profiled and fixed at the cause, the bundle held under budget in CI, and Core Web Vitals checked against field data rather than a lab run on office wifi.
The component library, the architecture note and an onboarding session so your team owns it — or we roll into a retainer and keep shipping the roadmap.
Defaults we reach for when the choice is ours, swapped freely for what your team already runs.
Dashboards, portals and public surfaces that stay fast as they grow, with the trade-offs written down.
A Shopify storefront for a Surat ethnic-wear label — 200+ SKUs of lehengas, sarees and suits organised by type, colour,...
A fleet, ePOD and route-optimisation platform built offline-first for drivers in low-connectivity corridors — because th...
A Shopify storefront for a Surat watch and eyewear retailer — browsable by gender, brand, style and combo, with predicti...
Tell us what it does and where it hurts. A senior engineer reads every enquiry and replies within one business day with scope, risk and a number — not a brochure.
FAQ
Proof
Swasthya Sarathi
A website and mobile app development project for a multi-service healthcare companion — helping peop...
Read itMV Tech Education
A website development project for a Bihar vocational institute — a course-catalogue and admissions s...
Read itPatna Taxi
A website development project for a Patna and Muzaffarpur cab operator — a fast, mobile-first taxi-b...
Read itReact that renders on the server, ranks in Google and does not ship 300 KB of JavaScript t...
ExploreThe framework we have shipped more business systems on than any other. Laravel 12 with Oct...
ExploreOne codebase, both stores, and a release you can fix the same afternoon. We build React Na...
ExploreLet's talk react development
A senior engineer reads every enquiry. You'll get a real answer — scope, risk and a number — within one business day.