Skip to content
PRSINDIA

PHP 8.4 · Laravel · Symfony · Composer

PHP Development

Modern PHP is a strictly typed, JIT-compiled language, and the fastest route to a correct business system we know. We do PHP development on Laravel and Symfony — typed, statically analysed, queue-backed, and legible to whoever inherits it.

  • PHP 8.4 with JIT, strict types and PHPStan in CI
  • Laravel or Symfony — chosen for the problem, not by habit
  • Queue-backed jobs that survive a sale day
  • Legacy PHP modernised route by route, never a big-bang rewrite
Why PHP

The language that quietly runs the web.

PHP has an image problem and a track record that flatly contradicts it. It is the server-side language behind roughly three quarters of the sites whose backend we can identify, and modern PHP — 8.4, strictly typed, JIT-compiled, Composer-managed — is a genuinely good tool that the internet argument never caught up with. We reach for PHP when the system is transactional and the domain is complicated: orders, payments, inventory, approvals, reconciliation, reporting, an admin panel. Laravel and Symfony have a mature answer for nearly every problem such a system hits, and the answer is usually the same one the next PHP engineer would have chosen — which is precisely what keeps the codebase alive after the team that wrote it has moved on.

Talk to a PHP engineer
~75
Of the known server side

PHP's share of sites whose server-side language is identifiable, per public W3Techs data. Not a claim about our clients — a fact about the web.

<45
p95 on the request path

Our target for an I/O-bound API on PHP 8.4 with OPcache and JIT, measured in production rather than a benchmark.

Level 8
PHPStan in CI

Strict static analysis from the first commit. An untyped property or a suppressed error fails the build, not a review.

0%+
Coverage on core paths

Pest or PHPUnit feature tests that hit the database, not mocks agreeing with themselves.

How we actually build it

The PHP people argue about on the internet stopped existing around 2015. Modern PHP — 8.3 and 8.4 — is a strictly typed, JIT-compiled language with enums, readonly properties, first-class callable syntax, fibers and an ecosystem held together by Composer and the PSR standards. We have shipped more revenue-carrying systems on it than on any other server-side stack, and the reason is unglamorous: a disciplined team ships a correct, tested, maintainable business application in PHP faster than in almost anything else, and the engineer who inherits it in three years recognises what they are looking at.

Laravel or Symfony is a real decision, not a default

Most of our PHP development is Laravel, because for a transactional product — orders, payments, inventory, approvals, reporting, an admin panel — its batteries-included answer to every problem is usually the one the next PHP engineer would have reached for anyway, which is what makes the codebase outlive the team that wrote it. We reach for Symfony when the domain wants explicit architecture over convention: a large system with many bounded contexts, a long-lived platform where the framework should stay out of the domain model, or a team that already lives in Symfony components. Both are excellent; choosing the wrong one for the shape of the problem is the mistake we are most often asked to unwind, and we decide it in week one and write down why.

Types and static analysis, not "PHP is loose"

Every project we start runs PHPStan or Psalm at a high level from the first commit, with strict types declared, real return types everywhere, and generics annotations on collections. The old complaint that PHP lets anything through is a complaint about undisciplined PHP. A modern codebase with static analysis in CI catches the same class of error a compiler would, before it reaches a review, let alone production. An untyped property or a suppressed analysis error is a review failure, not a style preference.

Queues and workers are where the application actually lives

Anything that talks to a system we do not control goes onto a queue — payment webhooks, GST filings, carrier APIs, invoice PDFs, e-way bills, notification fan-out. Jobs are idempotent, because a queue delivers twice eventually and that day should be uneventful; they retry with backoff and land in a dead-letter store with the full payload and a screen an operator can replay from. This single architectural habit is the largest difference between a PHP application that survives its first sale day and one that falls over inside it.

Legacy PHP is a rescue, rarely a rewrite

Half the PHP work that reaches us is a system on PHP 5.6 or 7.x — raw mysql_* calls, no framework, no tests, business logic braided through HTML. The instinct to rewrite it from scratch is almost always wrong and almost always expensive. We put the running code under characterisation tests first, lift it onto a supported PHP version and Composer autoloading, then strangle it route by route into a modern Laravel or Symfony codebase that ships the whole way through. The business keeps trading while the foundation is replaced underneath it.

The honest part

When PHP is the right call — and when it is not.

  Choose PHP Choose something else
Transactional business system Yes, and it is not close. Laravel or Symfony has a mature answer for orders, payments, inventory, approvals and reporting. Little we would recommend over it for this shape of problem at this budget.
100k concurrent WebSocket connections No. Even with an app server, this is not where PHP is strongest. Node.js or Go for the socket tier; keep PHP for the business logic behind it and let them talk over Redis.
Heavy CPU-bound ML or data crunching No. You would fight the language and lose to libraries that already exist elsewhere. Python, run as a separate service that PHP calls over a queue. A boring, reliable pattern.
Need an admin panel in a week Laravel with Filament: resources over your models, real permissions, audit trail. Days, not sprints. Few ecosystems match this. PHP at its most unfairly productive.
Team is JavaScript-only and will stay so Consider it anyway — the learning curve is a fortnight — but do not force it. NestJS on Node is the closest thing to Laravel discipline in that ecosystem.
Ageing PHP app everyone wants to bin Yes. Modernise it route by route while it keeps trading — usually far cheaper than the rewrite you were quoted. Only rebuild from scratch when the audit proves the code is genuinely beyond salvage.
What we build

PHP work we take on.

Six shapes of engagement cover nearly everything we are asked to do in PHP.

ERP & internal platforms

Inventory, procurement, approvals, GST-aware invoicing and the reporting layer finance stops exporting to Excel for — usually Laravel, Filament for the back office.

APIs for mobile & partners

Versioned REST APIs with Sanctum or Passport, rate limiting, idempotency keys and OpenAPI docs that are generated from the source, not hand-written.

Symfony domain platforms

Large systems with real bounded contexts, where explicit architecture and a framework that stays out of your domain model earn their keep.

Legacy PHP rescue

PHP 5.6 or 7.x, no framework, no tests — put under characterisation tests and strangled into modern Laravel or Symfony while it keeps shipping.

Performance & queue work

Profiling, N+1 elimination, index surgery, then isolated worker pools and an app server. Usually cheaper than the rewrite you were quoted.

Commerce & workflow backends

Pricing engines, order and fulfilment workflows, subscription and rental logic that will never fit into somebody else's data model.

Characteristics

What modern PHP gets you, with the caveats.

The things a buyer evaluating PHP actually wants to know, answered without the hedging.

  • Fast request path with OPcache & JIT

    Bytecode cached, hot code JIT-compiled. Most of our PHP APIs sit under 45ms at p95 once the queries are disciplined — and the queries are always the real lever.

  • Type safety a compiler would recognise

    Strict types, real return types, and PHPStan or Psalm at a high level in CI catch the errors people assume PHP lets through. Undisciplined PHP is the problem, not PHP.

  • Queues that survive a bad day

    Idempotent jobs, exponential backoff, a dead-letter store and a replay screen an operator can use without a developer or a terminal.

  • A deep, affordable hiring pool

    PHP and Laravel talent in India is large and reasonably priced, so you can staff the system internally later without a rescue mission or a bidding war.

  • Runs on modest hardware

    A stateless container behind a load balancer and Redis for cache and sessions. Most systems we run cost between ₹8,000 and ₹40,000 a month to host.

  • Reversible deploys

    Zero-downtime releases behind a health check, migrations always reversible, one-command rollback. The question is never whether a release fails but how fast you undo it.

Modernisation path

From ageing PHP to a codebase you can hire against.

The single most common thing we are asked to do with PHP. The sequence is deliberately boring.

  1. 01

    Audit and pin the behaviour

    Weeks 1–2

    We read the code, run it locally, map the data model, and write characterisation tests around the paths that carry money. You cannot safely change what you cannot describe, so we describe it first.

  2. 02

    Lift onto a supported PHP

    Weeks 2–4

    Off end-of-life PHP and onto 8.3 or 8.4, with Composer autoloading, a dependency inventory and the security holes that have been open for years closed. The app behaves identically; the ground under it is now solid.

  3. 03

    Introduce the framework at the edges

    Weeks 4–8

    A modern Laravel or Symfony application wraps the legacy one and takes new routes. Old and new run side by side behind one front door — no flag day, no freeze on delivery.

  4. 04

    Strangle route by route

    Ongoing

    Each sprint moves a slice of functionality into the modern codebase with tests, and retires the equivalent legacy path. Progress is visible every fortnight, and you can stop at any point with a working system.

  5. 05

    Harden and hand over

    Final 2 weeks

    Static analysis and a test suite in CI, observability wired in, reversible deploys, and an architecture note plus an onboarding session so your team owns it — or we stay on a retainer.

The stack

What ships with a PHP build from us.

Opinionated defaults we will happily swap for something you already run — but these are what we reach for when the choice is ours.

PHP 8.4
Laravel 12
Symfony 7
Composer

Slow or ageing PHP app? Bring it to us before you approve the rewrite.

Most PHP systems we are asked to rebuild do not need rebuilding — they need the queries fixed, the third parties moved onto queues and the framework introduced at the edges. A senior engineer replies within one business day with scope, risk and a number.

FAQ

The questions you were going to ask on the call.

Yes, and the objection is almost always aimed at PHP as it was a decade ago. PHP 8.4 is strictly typed, JIT-compiled and well tooled, and Laravel and Symfony are among the most productive full-stack frameworks in any language. The real question is never "is PHP serious", it is "what does this system do". For a transactional business application — orders, payments, inventory, workflow, reporting, an admin — PHP will reach production sooner and cheaper than a bespoke Node or Go stack, and stay legible to whoever inherits it. For a system holding a hundred thousand concurrent sockets, we would reach for something else and tell you so.

By the shape of the domain. Laravel for a product where convention and a batteries-included toolkit get you to production fast: most transactional business software fits here, and the codebase stays recognisable to the next Laravel engineer. Symfony where the system wants explicit architecture — many bounded contexts, a long-lived platform where the framework should stay out of the domain model, or a team already invested in Symfony components. We make the call in week one, write down the trade-off, and neither choice locks you out of the wider PHP ecosystem, since both sit on Composer and the PSR standards.

Almost always, and a full rewrite is usually the wrong instinct — it is expensive, risky, and stops delivery for months. We put the running system under characterisation tests so behaviour is pinned down, lift it onto a supported PHP version and Composer autoloading, then strangle it route by route into a modern Laravel or Symfony codebase. The application keeps trading the entire time. A rewrite is only the right answer when the existing code is genuinely beyond salvage, and we will show you the maintenance maths before recommending it.

It handles the scale most businesses actually have. PHP 8.4 with OPcache and JIT is fast on the request path, and we run PHP systems doing millions of requests a day: stateless containers behind a load balancer, Redis for cache and sessions, a read replica for reporting, and workers isolated so a backlog of PDF generation cannot slow checkout. For extreme throughput we add an application server like FrankenPHP or RoadRunner that keeps the app resident and removes per-request bootstrap. The performance ceiling in practice is almost never PHP — it is the database, and it would have been the database in any language.

Strict types and PHPStan or Psalm at a high level in CI from the first commit, so a whole class of error is caught before review. Pest or PHPUnit feature tests that exercise the HTTP layer and the real database rather than mocking everything into agreement. Reversible migrations, PSR coding standards enforced automatically, and dependencies kept current rather than frozen until an upgrade becomes a crisis. The measure of a healthy PHP codebase is that a new engineer can ship a change safely in their first week, and that is what we build toward.

A focused internal tool or workflow system is typically 8 to 12 weeks from around ₹8,50,000. A full platform — multi-role, payments, integrations, a real admin and an API for a mobile client — is 16 to 28 weeks and starts around ₹22,00,000. A legacy modernisation is scoped from a paid audit because the number is driven by how much of the old system is salvageable. The variable that moves every estimate is integrations: each upstream system you do not control is a risk with a schedule attached, which is exactly what discovery exists to price.

Proof

Shipped, measured, still running.

All case studies

Swasthya Sarathi

A healthcare-companion platform for Swasthya Sarathi

A website and mobile app development project for a multi-service healthcare companion — helping peop...

Read it

MV Tech Education

A course and admissions platform for MV Tech Education

A website development project for a Bihar vocational institute — a course-catalogue and admissions s...

Read it

Patna Taxi

A booking-focused taxi website for Patna Taxi across Bihar

A website development project for a Patna and Muzaffarpur cab operator — a fast, mobile-first taxi-b...

Read it

Let's talk php development

Bring us the hard version of the problem.

A senior engineer reads every enquiry. You'll get a real answer — scope, risk and a number — within one business day.